“As this Court observed many months ago, this case has been litigated on the premise — based ‘in no small part’ on Defendants’ own ‘insist(ence)’ — that the speedy resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims is a matter of great private and public importance.”
Furman also may review requests from the plaintiffs to issue sanctions in the case because administration witnesses allegedly weren’t truthful, and to stop the administration from making any changes to the census.
Requests for changes of lawyers in civil cases are almost always allowed, making Furman’s ruling Tuesday even more surprising in a case that has taken several astonishing turns already.
President Donald Trump
threw the issue into fresh confusion last week when he announced that he would continue his push to add a question to the decennial survey about citizenship status despite a Supreme Court ruling in late June blocking the move.
Civil rights groups argue that including it will scare off legal immigrants as well as undocumented migrants, leading to an inaccurate population count. The census is used to set voting boundaries as well as funding for social assistance and other government programs.
The government had said the issue needed to be resolved by July 1 in order to begin printing the questionnaires on time and officials said last week they would proceed, despite Trump’s continuing efforts to get the citizenship question added.
Trump is still considering an executive order in an effort to force a citizenship question onto the 2020 census, according to officials familiar with the situation.
Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday the administration would decide in the “next day or two” on which option to take on the census.
“We’ve been considering all the options,” he told reporters in South Carolina, adding he’s been in “constant discussions with the President” over the past week.
“Over the next day or two you’ll see what approach we’re taking,” Barr said. Going with an executive order, he argued, “does provide a pathway for getting a question on the census.”
The Justice Department declined to comment Tuesday.
Trump tweeted earlier Tuesday about the “strained” ruling, saying it “shows how incredibly important our 2020 Election is.”
“I have long heard that the appointment of Supreme Court Justices is a President’s most important decision. SO TRUE!” he tweeted.
There are two other live challenges over the 2020 census and its inclusion of a citizenship question before other federal judges. One of the cases, in California, has a hearing scheduled for Wednessday. In the other, in Maryland, plaintiffs are allowed to collect new evidence on whether the administration intended to discriminate by adding the question.
This story has been updated.